On July 20, 1969, Apollo 11’s lunar module, Eagle, touched down in the Sea of Tranquility, marking humanity’s first steps on the Moon. But what if the primary landing site wasn’t viable? NASA meticulously planned backup landing sites to ensure the mission’s success. Exploring these alternate locations offers a fascinating glimpse into the strategic planning behind this historic achievement. This guide delves into how to locate Apollo 11’s backup sites on the lunar surface, using modern tools, data, and imagery. From understanding NASA’s site selection criteria to leveraging lunar maps and observatories, we’ll uncover the “what-ifs” of where the Eagle might have landed.
Apollo 11's Backup Landing Sites
Apollo 11 had three primary target landing sites, designated Sites 2, 3, and 5. Site 2 in Mare Tranquillitatis was the prime site where the Eagle actually landed. The other two were contingency sites:
Site 3: Sinus Medii (0.42°N, 358.67°E or 1.20°W, 0.25°N): This site in the Central Bay was the target if the Apollo 11 launch had been delayed by two days, from July 16 to July 18, 1969. Sinus Medii is located near the very center of the Moon's Earth-facing hemisphere.
2 Site 5: Oceanus Procellarum (1.67°N, 318.33°E or 41.40°W, 1.40°N): This site in the Ocean of Storms would have been used if the launch was delayed until July 21, 1969. It's located significantly west of Tranquility Base.
How These Sites Were Chosen 🧐
The selection of Apollo landing sites was a meticulous process driven by a combination of safety, engineering constraints, and scientific objectives. Here's a breakdown of the key criteria:
Safety Paramount: This was the overriding concern. Sites needed to be as flat and free of large craters, boulders, and steep slopes as possible to ensure a safe touchdown for the Lunar Module (LM).
Equatorial Proximity: All sites were located within 5 degrees of the lunar equator. This minimized the fuel required for the descent and ascent phases and provided a more stable trajectory.
Lighting Conditions: Optimal visibility during the landing approach was critical. Sites were chosen such that the Sun angle during the expected landing window was between 7 and 20 degrees behind the LM.
3 This created adequate shadows for terrain discernment without being too dark. This criterion effectively limited the launch window to just one day per month for a given site.Free-Return Trajectory: The sites had to be within reach of the Apollo spacecraft in a "free-return trajectory." This was a safety measure that would allow the spacecraft to loop around the Moon and return to Earth without any engine firings in case of a major problem during the translunar coast.
Geological Interest: While safety was primary for Apollo 11, later missions placed more emphasis on geological diversity. For Apollo 11, the mare regions (dark, flat plains) were preferred as they were thought to be smoother and safer.
4 Orbital Imaging and Surface Data: High-resolution photographs from Lunar Orbiters and surface data/images from Surveyor probes were extensively used to map and characterize potential landing zones.
5
How to "Find" Them Today 🗺️
While you can't physically visit them (yet!), you can locate these sites using lunar maps and online tools:
Lunar Maps and Atlases: Many detailed lunar maps, both physical and digital, include the coordinates of Apollo landing sites.
6 Look for maps that highlight specific mission landing zones.Online Lunar Viewers: Websites like NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) provide incredibly detailed imagery of the Moon's surface.
7 You can often zoom in to the actual Apollo landing sites and even see the tracks left by astronauts and descent stages of the LMs.8 By inputting the coordinates provided above for Sites 3 and 5, you can explore what the alternative landing areas look like.Astronomy Apps: Many modern astronomy applications for smartphones and tablets allow you to point your device at the Moon and identify features, including historical landing sites.
9
By exploring these resources, you can gain a fascinating perspective on the "what ifs" of the Apollo 11 mission and appreciate the incredible planning and precision that went into humankind's first journey to the Moon.